Which one would be a good buy for a first time puchase? Please list prior experience and pros and cons you have found with dealing with these firearms.
PaulyFu223 said:I can only speak from my personal experience. I own a Bushmaster XM15 20" heavy barrel, and have had it for five years now and have never had one problem with it. It is accurate as heck and has gone through several incarnations of different optics and bipods, pistol grips and slings. I love it.
just recently switched to a quad rail gas block and the worst thing about it was getting those tapered pins out, apparently Bushmaster pins are a real tight fit. Another plus.KCK2100 said:+1 ... same 20 inch heavy barrel ... I've run sooo many of rounds through it .... No worries ...
The AR was not designed to be a piston rod driven weapon. All other piston designs ride on rail. The AR does not, leading to bolt tilt that put additional wear on the back of the BCG/extension and the back of the bolt lugs.PaulC2287 said:If you have the money however, I would highly recommend looking into purchasing a complete Bushmaster (or Colt for that matter) lower and then slapping on an Adams Arms gas piston upper (LWRC upper if you have the bookoo bucks for it) your maintenance of the rifle will be cut drastically by using a piston vs. direct gas impingement. The huge bonus of gas piston is the rugged functionality of the AK (no jams, ability to fire with water / sand in the chamber, etc) in a vastly superior weapons platform. The combined cost of separate upper and lower as I have describe would likely be only 200-300 more than a traditional AR config.
Since this is your first AR, I would spend the money if you can. Even if you have to push the purchase back 2-3 months I would say do everything you can to get a piston upper on a great lower like a Colt of Bushy.
Do some hw and get back to me...I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
One more thing...If you like the match AR aspect consider this: gas piston systems allow you the functionality to turn the piston gas off completely and allow you to fire the rifle from a closed bolt such as a bolt action would fire. Much greater accuracy and practically zero recoil since the moving parts wont move in that setting (your charging handle would be the equivalent of a bolt actions bolt).
PaulyFu223 said:just recently switched to a quad rail gas block and the worst thing about it was getting those tapered pins out, apparently Bushmaster pins are a real tight fit. Another plus.
Ask and ye shall receive!KCK2100 said:Say Pauly any pics ??? I'd like to see what you did with her (your rifle) .....
F-in Sweet !!! ... In the words of the iconic Bill Murray in Stripes "Lee Harvey, you are a madman. When you stole that cow, and your friend tried to *&*^%% with the cow. I want to party with you, cowboy" ...PaulyFu223 said:Ask and ye shall receive!
Aside from the gas block, I added a quad rail, a magwell grip, magpull extended trigger guard, tango down pistol grip, harris bipod, and in this picture is a Bushnell Bone Collector Scope, my other configuration is with Troy Industries flip up battle sights.
It is not. Its a everyday rifle for everyday people. If you shoot from the bench a couple hundred rounds a year, then its a great rifle for the money. If you shoot a lot, then your money is better spent on the likes of Colt, DD, BCM Noveske.PaulyFu223 said:Its funny, I bought my Bushmaster before there was a TON of companies producing the AR platform, but I never knew it to be held in that type of regard to contend against a Colt.
Just watched the video. Interesting but there are a few things wrong with it. I took a look at my 10 year old bushmaster bolt carrier (the one on far right in his video) and the staking was exactly the same as his favored smith and wesson. I dont know what bolt he used for sure, but the staking in my bushmaster is good.longbeach tony said:Word was Bushmaster really did not stake gas keys all that well, I hear they have done better but still not as good as Colt.
Anyone who owns a Bushmaster can chime in as I own a Colt.
Take a look at this
everything he said in the video is pretty much spot onSeancusmc said:Just watched the video. Interesting but there are a few things wrong with it. I took a look at my 10 year old bushmaster bolt carrier (the one on far right in his video) and the staking was exactly the same as his favored smith and wesson. I dont know what bolt he used for sure, but the staking in my bushmaster is good.
He was wrong about a few other things in there regarding the firing pin and the extra mass on the bolt carrier group in military rifles. I think he is just making things up as he goes.