Long Island Shooters Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
653 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Immediately after the Virginia Tech massacre, a few of the families of the Virginia Tech victims anointed themselves as the official spokespersons for all of the Virginia Tech victims and victim's families. They are cocksure that they have the solution: more gun control. Forget that guns were banned on campus back in 2007. Forget that Cho passed a background check TWICE. Forget that Cho followed the One Handgun A Month law to the letter. Forget that massacres always seem to happen at gun-free-zones, like schools and malls, but not a places like gun shows.

One mother, Holly Adams, whose daughter, Leslie, was murdered by Cho, has chosen to speak out against the insanity of the continued banning of guns at universities and colleges. I have met Holly and seen the pain in her eyes. She knows in her heart that the only way her daughter could have been saved on that horrible day was for someone to have been able to shoot back at Cho. She doesn't want to have another parent go through what she did because she did not speak up about the dangers of gun control.

Here is a statement that Holly sent to me today:

http://www.virginiaopencarry.org/press.html
--
On April 16, 2007, my child, Leslie Sherman, was killed by Seung-Hui Cho during the Virginia Tech massacre. Today is the fifth anniversary of her death. Always in my memories, every day I wish that this tragedy was a nightmare and I could wake up to hold my daughter even if it is just one more time. That opportunity might have been possible if someone been able to defend and protect my daughter in her classroom before Cho took 30 precious lives.

There is an unfortunate drive for more gun control and the continuation of preventing guns on campus by parents whose children lived or survived during that fatal day. Several family members of those victims have actively voiced their support for increased gun control measures. As result, it has been assumed that they speak for all families of the
Virginia Tech victims. I am writing this to make it clear that this is not the case. They do not represent me and my views.

Speaking for myself, I would give anything if someone on campus; a professor, one of the trained military or guardsman taking classes or another student could have saved my daughter by shooting Cho before he killed our loved ones. Because professors, staff and students are precluded from protecting themselves on campus, Cho, a student at
Virginia Tech himself, was able to simply walk on campus and go on a killing rampage with no worry that anyone would stop him.

I ask a simple question: Would the other parents of victims be forever thankful if a professor or student was allowed to carry a firearm and could have stopped Seung-Hui Cho before their loved one was injured or killed? I would be. I also suspect that the tragedy may not have occurred at all if Cho knew that either faculty members or students were
permitted to carry their own weapons on campus. Cho took his own life before campus police were able to reach him and put a stop to his killing spree.

A sad testament to this anniversary date is the number of similar killings in schools and public places that have taken place afterwards as if nothing has changed to help prevent such needless and heartbreaking events. That is why I fully support the VCDL in their outstanding efforts to help prevent this type of tragedy and loss from
occurring in the future.

Holly Adams

***************************************************************************
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,504 Posts
It is true but you cannot say it would not have happened but it might not have been as bad. The one thing for sure is that they wouldn't have been lamb led to the slorder.

The Antis never tell you about the gunman in Israel who was shoot and kill by a armed classmate before his spree could manifest in to the horror he plan on.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,504 Posts
But I see where the school is concernd most college student are not responsible enough. Living near Stoney Brook university it like most universities are party schools. Alcohol and gun are a real bad combo. What to do? I don't know. I'm mature enough to carry. Why because I don't really want to and when I get a CCW I will be trained to do so.
 

·
AMF YOYO
Joined
·
3,602 Posts
wreckhog said:
Hopefully parents choose not to send kids to a school with a cavalier disregard for 2A.
Unfortunately, if parents were to follow this guideline, most kids would never get to go to college. The state of 'higher education' in this country is a damn shame.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
24,899 Posts
She states in the story she wishes facility, trained military or guardsman, and students could have carried and possibly stopped him. College age kids IMO are not responsible enough to be carrying. But that's my northeast sinkhole talking... If they grew up in the west or south and it was a part of their lives forever then who knows.

A brave woman, speaking her true feelings... may the victims RIP
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,963 Posts
Myrcinus said:
Unfortunately, if parents were to follow this guideline, most kids would never get to go to college. The state of 'higher education' in this country is a damn shame.
If enough parents fought back, things would change. Much like anything else in the world.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
809 Posts
She seems like a very smart and reasonable women, and my heart goes out to her. Very tragic situation.

I always felt the same way especially after watching the HBO documentary "Gun Fight". HBO interviewed a young man who was shot and survived. He gave his account on what happened that day and said that once they heard the shooting all they could do was shut off the lights and hide under the desks in the classroom. Soon after Cho came in and started shooting. Had someone in that room been carrying they could have stopped the threat the second he walked into the room. Would have saved many lives. If I remember correctly this young man was for more gun control, he obviously did not see how a firearm in the classroom could have saved his classmates lives.

We need to learn from the past. But unfortunately they won't and it will happen again. Sad situation
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,870 Posts
How can we say college kids are not responsible enough to carry?  On your 18th birthday, don't you have to register for the draft?  So, they aren't responsible enough to carry at school, but if there is a need, we can send them around the world to fight a possibly die.  I don't get it.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,713 Posts
HKFANBOY said:
How can we say college kids are not responsible enough to carry? On your 18th birthday, don't you have to register for the draft? So, they aren't responsible enough to carry at school, but if there is a need, we can send them around the world to fight a possibly die. I don't get it.
You are expecting things to make sense? They can't buy alcohol but they can run around with a rifle in Afghanistan and Iraq. You know what else does not make sense? US military personnel not allowed to carry guns on bases in the USA.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,504 Posts
HKFANBOY said:
How can we say college kids are not responsible enough to carry? On your 18th birthday, don't you have to register for the draft? So, they aren't responsible enough to carry at school, but if there is a need, we can send them around the world to fight a possibly die. I don't get it.
If the military base was like my frat house there wold be alot less soldiers on Monday. AND YES their is a differance just like some kids are more mature then others. .

But say Suffolk commun ity College where you are not livipng in dorms and the mix of people range from 18 to 80 there is a difference.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top