[C120]

No DA with any sanity would want to charge a licensed firearm owner for carrying a gun in a "Sensitive location". Attorneys like to go for cases they know they could win, anyone could literally just cite Bruen in court and have it taken up through courts.

 

[boosti]

No DA with any sanity would want to charge a licensed firearm owner for carrying a gun in a "Sensitive location". Attorneys like to go for cases they know they could win, anyone could literally just cite Bruen in court and have it taken up through courts.

It depends on the political agenda, we only have one known incident of someone using his pistol in a sensitive location to stop a crazed individual with a knife.

 

[C120]

It depends on the political agenda, we only have one known incident of someone using his pistol in a sensitive location to stop a crazed individual with a knife.

True, I could certainly see something like this being prosecuted in NYC because liberals like to overreach and usually it bites em in the ass.

 

[boosti]

True, I could certainly see something like this being prosecuted in NYC because liberals like to overreach and usually it bites em in the ass.

The Governor and Mayor will talk about taking another gun off the streets. The good guy is the enemy to these leftist politicians!

 

[2edgesword]

So I guess the person who detained the knife wielding perp upstate in Applebys was not charged?

Charging and making a big stink over this highlights the stupidity of the law. You have a CCW holder that .may have saved a life only because he had his firearm with him. Do the powers that be really want the kind of advertising that demonstrates how useless and dangerous the law is?

 

[notphilivey]

I’m hoping this DA has a press conference and public ally explains why he is using his discretion not to charge. It would counter the lefts obsession with making every thug who uses a gun in a crime front page news.