I would suspect they're looking for more plaintiffs, to make it harder for NYS to pull standing tricks and you would qualify, under requirement #3.
Gary
I would suspect they're looking for more plaintiffs, to make it harder for NYS to pull standing tricks and you would qualify, under requirement #3.dont they have people already? Dose this indicate they might not have standing in that case? I would sign up but i dont fit the criteria as i already got my carry
Yes but is it fact or just another "better get in line, with our way of thinking or else..." threat, to get the masses doing what SCPD wants, rather than what the law stipulates? My suspicion level is high, on this one.I got it from law enforcement leadership, but seemed dubious
This might be the answer, to all of our questions, about who got arrested. The state police says "no one."![]()
NY State Police: Zero arrests for violations of new carry law
It’s been five months since New York’s ironically named Concealed Carry Improvement Act took effect, and according to the New York State Police they have received not a single complaint no...bearingarms.com
What case? We were considering/evaluating the validity of what a SCPD official claimed was an arrest, for violating CCIA's restricted and sensitive places list. State police claim no such arrests, per notphilivey's posted hot link, above.Did someone post the docket number for this case? I'm at work and didn't see it.