It is, but for $10 it saves a trip and I'd spend that in gas getting there. The whole system is flawed.anygunwilldoifuwilldo said:but even in Nassau you still have to p/u one in person (you know) thats still a trip(unless your killing two birds a inspection for one and p/u a doc @ same time) - still Horshe Crap
You are on the right track.anygunwilldoifuwilldo said:MY suggestion: make it accessible on-line with our license # and a password(set by License holder upon setting up themselves w/in the 'NEW' system or @ PLB HQ - pay for doc via CC or e-check,whatever they want to collect) Print-out doc and go. I would even pay more for the e-doc just to save fuel and time going back and fourth. One trip less hassle - there has to be a better way!
Yup. Easy as can be. When I had my nassau license, I used to buy 4 in a shot. If I purchased that many guns in the year I would buy more when I got down to 1. For $10 a shot, I never had to make more than 1 trip to the licensing dept.FULL METAL JACKET said:It is, but for $10 it saves a trip and I'd spend that in gas getting there. The whole system is flawed.
Gun registration = gun control and taxation
I hear what you are saying, but if Romney is elected, do you think the number of gun owners is going to increase exponentially like in the last election? All of the panic buying from people convinced the guy from Chicago was gonna be a Bloomberg gave manufacturers the best years (maybe ever?) and none of the Obama anti-gun agenda really manifested itself in any meaningful way. Add to that if Obama is reeleced I anticipate another entire round of panic buying on the fear that he will use his second term to outlaw guns- which, quite frankly, I don't see happening.grifhunter said:You guys are all commited gun owners who arn't easily put off. The County pistol people know you are out there BUT....
They know that a substantial number of folks whose willingness to purchase a handgun is only casual, will give up in the face of the expense, time waste, invasions of privacy, redundant paperwork, patronizing attitudes, red tape, ambiguous fine print, and draconian sanctions that befall an innocent mistake.
The goal is to quash gun ownership to whatever degree they can get away with.
Time to push back folks. Get Romney elected, keep the pro gun majority in the Supreme court and we'll see a lot of this nonsense disappear through the courts.
The Democrat platform out now clearly includes an assault weapon ban worse than the first, end of person to person sales and other unstated "reasonable restrictions". Obama already uses the ATF for nefarious purposes and already apointed two NY City leftist, anti gun, women lawyers to the Supreme Court. He'll look for more legacy legislation in a 2nd term and if you think it won't include guns, just look at his anti gun rhetoric and record while he was a community organizer and senator. But the Supreme court is something no gunowner should be taking a chance on... its too long term and too irreversable.Captain Will said:I hear what you are saying, but if Romney is elected, do you think the number of gun owners is going to increase exponentially like in the last election? All of the panic buying from people convinced the guy from Chicago was gonna be a Bloomberg gave manufacturers the best years (maybe ever?) and none of the Obama anti-gun agenda really manifested itself in any meaningful way. Add to that if Obama is reeleced I anticipate another entire round of panic buying on the fear that he will use his second term to outlaw guns- which, quite frankly, I don't see happening.
I think if Romney is elected the panic buying will cease, the ammo hoarding will cease, and the good news is a case of .223 will probably go back to the 250 bucks or so it SHOULD be. All of the other non 2A issues, well that's another thing entirely.
That poster about Obama being "gun salesman of the year", well, there is a lot of truth to that. I'm not voting for Obama, but if I were a gun manufacturer I might be.
