Missed it.......I must be slipping!Lemming said:
GOOD!SteveG said:An Oklahoma pharmacist was sentenced to life with possiblity of parole for shooting a hold up man.
The problem was he shot one guy chased theother one away and went back got another gun and shot the first guy who was on the floor 5 more times.
He deserves what he got! He eliminated the threat, then came BACK and shot the guy on the floor FIVE more times?HKFANBOY said:I understand the additional 5 shots were wrong, but life? I might be in the minority but I think that is way too harsh. Listen, none of us were there in that stressfull situation. This guy is just trying to earn a living. We also have a 16 year old who is willing to take part in a felony with a buddy using a gun. That young, willing to take part in such a violent act. I think the world is a much better place with that kid gone. Now this guys life is ruined.
I agree, and seeing how the kid with the gun had left the store, there was no real threat to the guy. Had the kid tried to attack him, that would be a different story.Mad Russian said:He deserves what he got! He eliminated the threat, then came BACK and shot the guy on the floor FIVE more times?
I'm all for defending self and property, but the guy overstepped the boundary between defense and murder!
Yeah, I hate to agree, but I do.Mad Russian said:He deserves what he got! He eliminated the threat, then came BACK and shot the guy on the floor FIVE more times?
I'm all for defending self and property, but the guy overstepped the boundary between defense and murder!
I hate to agree too -- but I do.AkunaMatata said:Yeah, I hate to agree, but I do.
It's like the dude just thought he had an excuse to kill someone so he used it.
+1 ..... and then duct taped his mouth , stuffed him in the trunk of his car for about a month then dumped him in the woods. Hey it's worked before.STACHYBOTRYS said:Shoulda lost that surveilence tape........
Touche. Such an event still contributes to the deterrent factor with regard to the prospective robber, it's just unfortunate the clerks have to martyr themselves with the law NOT on their side. :/ However, the evidence did exist, as do the laws, and he executed that degenerate drug addict.DanJ said:They should have a "don't start poop" law. If you were not the initial aggressor you should have immunity from prosecution.
The pharmacist didn't start it the robber did. I could care less what happened to the robber. Maybe if more robbers were executed they might think twice before doing this.
It's not like the pharmacist went and shot a random person.