Long Island Shooters Forum banner
1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have been closely following some of the lawsuits against the CCIA. I also keep in touch with the GOA attorney on the Atonyuk case.
-Hardawayv Negrelli -Houses of Worship: Preliminary Injunction
-Antonyuk v Hochel- Restricted and sensitive places good moral character- Preliminary Injunction
-Giambalvo v Suffolk County
- NYSERPA v Bruen- second go round
Not sure what other cases are out there
There are some aspects of the law that are still troubling. The licensing agencies can still add more restrictive requirements that will just put us back to where we were. See below.

Also, Times Square and public transportation are still sensitive places. Going forward we need to make sure someone has standing so we can get most of this stuff blocked by a permanent injunction.
Rectangle Font Parallel Magenta Number
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Gary,
I check in with The attorney for GOA periodically, and he said the trial for the permanent injunction is a long way off. In the mean time the SCPD can make up all the stupid rules they want to slow things down. I am an NRA certified pistol instructor and a chief range safety officer. I have had my permit for 42 years and they still want me to take a saftey class, and I shoot competitively every week. I disagree with them on having to take the class and why just to convert to a full carry. The law says only for renewals and new licenses. They are going to make life miserable until the trial for the permanant injunction. I hope in the trial we delve into everything. we have been tripped up in the past with the issue of standing. Thats why the preliminary injunction did not throw out the entire law. I think training will stay regardless, but the cost needs to come down. I suggest the trainers defer some of their income and donate it to the GOA, NYSERPA and other groups directly suing the state.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Agreed. I think the standing issue can be taken care of with the right testimony. Not sure why it was not done during the hearing, as it was easy to do. If you said you are traveling to Tennesee, you could have just as easily said you may go to the city to see a play in Times Square and take public transportation. Knowing now the way Judge Suddaby, is we need to cross all the t's and dot the i's. I think both Judge Suddaby and Sinatra did a good job of also Shredding the CCIA. Its just unfornuinate that we need to waste taxpayers money and ours to obtain a right that is already leagally ours.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
This is turning into a legal ping pong ball. How the state got a stay is beyond me. I guess the appeals court Judges did not read the Bruen decision or maybe even The Suddaby Preliminary Injunction decision. It seems like this will go back and forth forever, which is exactly what the state wants. Judge Thomas needs to step in and slap these people silly.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top