How is this a tragedy. The article says it was justifiable.
Justifiable my A&*.....man with a gun shoots teenage boy who has no weapon. Yeah right, thats justifiable ??)wreckhog said:How is this a tragedy. The article says it was justifiable.
It sounds more like hunting than watching the neighborhood. This is the stuff that gives the rest of us a bad name.T.Webb said:The neighborhood watch guy was wrong. This was not what the "Stand your ground" law was about. The local popo's definitely dropped the ball here. (Not bashing, just observing. And my observations are based on the presented evidence).
Unfortunately this will lead to bad press for the Stand-your-Ground and pro 2A advocates as well.
Troll.wreckhog said:How is this a tragedy. The article says it was justifiable.
+1JoeyPBasically said:Al Sharpton has nothing to do with the case, the facts do.
3 sides to a story, listen to the 2 911 calls recorded and read the facts of the case. All 3 sides say the same thing. This genetic defect should be put down. One bad apple spoils the whole bunch, this idiot just made everyone who owns a gun look bad. He has literally called 911 over 40 times in a year to report suspicious characters, all of whom were black. He was the "neighborhood watch" who didn't realize he was stalking his own neighbor.FULL METAL JACKET said:Always 3 sides to every story. My interpretation is, the shooter was the initial aggressor and not protected by the stand your ground law. 911 told him they didn't need him to peruse the suspect and he didn't listen.
This guys actions IMO bring negative attention to a touchy subject at a time when we all as Americans need positive things to happen in the gun world!