Joined
·
17 Posts
This is a major win for us.
Court Cases Against New York’s CCIA
1041 - 1060 of 1087 Posts
Not a win yet.
Joined
·
12,519 Posts
The Niagara D.A. a defendant, conceded the Sensitive restriction for Religious locations is unconstitutional.
A major win is hopefully the Second Circuit agrees with Judge Suddaby and Judge Sinatra rulings and the state appeals it going to the SCOTUS!
Joined
·
116 Posts
Brief filed by plaintiffs for 2nd circuit appeal - Christian v Nigrelli. This brief focuses on the private property restriction. Emphasizes “standing” by pointing out that Mr. Christian has only been able to exercise his second amendment right three times since the law was passed, as compared to daily previously.
Joined
·
2,714 Posts
Excellent.
Joined
·
352 Posts
NYSRPA v. Nigrelli (CCIA Lawsuit) originally Bruen 2
|
Joined
·
4 Posts
Is this legit? I don't see anything about it on the NYSRPA website.NYSRPA v. Nigrelli (CCIA Lawsuit) originally Bruen 2
![]()
IF YOU MEET THE CRITERIA: ACT NOW!
originally NYSRPA vs Bruen 2
The NYSRPA is looking for individuals, who meet the requirements listed below, to join our challenge. Please respond to this email with your name and contact information if you are interested in becoming a plaintiff in the lawsuit and meet any of these requirements:
- Submitted after September 1, 2022 an application for a carry license and that application was denied.
- Submitted after September 1, 2022, an application for a carry license and that application is still pending.
- Possess an unrestricted carry license and desire to carry a firearm into any of these locations:
1. A place controlled by the federal, state, or local government that is used for government administration.
2. Public transit (bus, ferry, train, subway, etc.);
3. Library, public playground, public park, zoo, nursery or childcare center, or summer camp.
4. A mental health or addiction facility or place for individuals with developmental disabilities.
5. A homeless or domestic violence shelter.
6. A senior center.
7. Theater, sports stadium or arena, racetrack, museum, banquet hall, or casino.
All responders should not otherwise be prohibited from obtaining a carry permit.
Thank you all for your support and time is of the essence.
Tom King
Cogito ergo armatum sum
Joined
·
274 Posts
I sent an email, to [email protected] and did receive an acknowledgment.
Joined
·
352 Posts
Yes, received a email by [email protected]..
Joined
·
4 Posts
OK, thanks. So they're looking for people to join a class-action suit? Seems to me that every permit holder in NY would want to get in on that.
Joined
·
2,714 Posts
Maybe, but I would suspect they are looking for good people to actually be the plaintiffs to sue much like they did in the Bruen case.
Joined
·
4 Posts
But what makes someone a "good" plaintiff? I think every permit holder and applicant has been wronged here.
Joined
·
2,714 Posts
Absolutely, but this isn't like signing up people with mesothelioma so we can sue the asbestos people and then spread the money around. This is a constitutional right that everyone should enjoy, even those who have chosen not to exercise it. Why go through the trouble of signing up thousands of gun owners when you just need a one or a few to win?
With this in mind, a lot of factors can go into what makes a good plaintiff such as background, geography, free time, money, communication skills, etc. For example, I live in a neighborhood with zero crime and had a Full Carry license for years, so I wouldn't have made a good candidate for the Bruen case. A NYC nurse who has been assaulted a few times and keeps getting denied a carry permit is a better choice. To use another example, let's say we wanted to challenge the SAFE Act. Would it be better to get a guy with 5 registered ARs and a bunch of evil features upstate, or would a Maryland resident who owns no rifles under a more draconian law be better?
Beyond that, I would imagine the attorneys in this case have a good idea of what they are looking for.
Joined
·
4 Posts
Thanks. That clarifies things a great deal.
Joined
·
116 Posts
NYS/LeTush's 2nd Circuit Appeal brief against Christian/FPA (private property provision) is in. Starts off of course arguing lack of standing; then discusses what era's laws and practices are allowed/excluded by Bruen;
Pathetically tries to use the new New Jersey law as 'proof' that laws like CCIA are 'common' - "For the same reason, plaintiffs are wrong to focus on the purported “outlier” status of New York’s present-day law. ... New York is not alone in regulating concealed carry on private property. ... To the contrary, New Jersey has recently enacted a law similar to the private-property provision. "
Pathetically tries to use the new New Jersey law as 'proof' that laws like CCIA are 'common' - "For the same reason, plaintiffs are wrong to focus on the purported “outlier” status of New York’s present-day law. ... New York is not alone in regulating concealed carry on private property. ... To the contrary, New Jersey has recently enacted a law similar to the private-property provision. "
And Judge Bumb in this New Jersey case issued a TRO on the enforcement of the private property provision as well as many of the sensitive locations declaring them unconstitutional. They conveniently forgot to mention that. They know they are in trouble. They are reaching for anything they can
yepppppp
1041 - 1060 of 1087 Posts
