Long Island Shooters Forum banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Grand Poobah
Joined
·
21,090 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
"For example, the end of LBK culture coincided with a period of climate change."

Scientists find evidence of prehistoric massacre in Europe

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/08/17/scientists-find-evidence-prehistoric-massacre-in-europe/?intcmp=hpbt4

BERLIN - Scientists say they have found rare evidence of a prehistoric massacre in Europe after discovering a 7,000-year-old mass grave with skeletal remains from some of the continent's first farmers bearing terrible wounds.

Archaeologists who painstakingly examined the bones of some 26 men, women and children buried in the Stone Age grave site at Schoeneck-Kilianstaedten, near Frankfurt, say they found blunt force marks to the head, arrow wounds and deliberate efforts to smash at least half of the victims' shins - either to stop them from running away or as a grim message to survivors.

"It was either torture or mutilation. We can't say for sure whether the victims were still alive," said Christian Meyer, one of the authors of the study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Meyer said the findings from Schoeneck-Kilianstaedten bolster theories put forward after the earlier discovery of two other grave sites in Germany and Austria. At all three sites, the victims and the perpetrators appeared to have been from the Linearbandkeramik - or LBK - culture, a farming people who arrived in central Europe about 5,500 B.C. Their name derives from the German phrase for "linear band ceramics," a reference to the style of their pottery.

Intriguingly, the sites have all been dated toward the end of the LBK's 600-year presence, suggesting that members of this culture - which is thought to have developed in what is now Hungary and spread along the Danube River - may have turned on each other.

"It's about finding patterns. One mass grave was spectacular, but it was just a single grave. But when several such sites are found from the same period, then a pattern emerges," said Meyer.

In their article, the authors suggested that "the new evidence ... in conjunction with previous results, indicates that massacres of entire communities were not isolated occurrences but rather were frequent features of the last phases of the LBK."

Chris Scarre, an archaeologist at the University of Durham, England, who wasn't involved in the study, said its conclusions seemed well supported by the evidence.

"What is particularly interesting is the level of violence. Not just the suppression of a rival community - if that is what it was - but the egregious and systematic breaking of the lower legs," said Scarre. "It suggests the use of terror tactics as part of this inter-community violence."

Meyer, an anthropologist at the University of Mainz, Germany, said nobody can say for sure what prompted the killings so long after the fact. But it's possible to put forward theories, based on what's known about the LBK culture and the conditions they faced. For example, the end of LBK culture coincided with a period of climate change.

"The LBK population had expanded considerably, and this increases the potential for conflict," said Meyer. "Also, the LBK were farmers, they settled. So unlike hunter gatherers, who could move away to avoid conflict, these people couldn't just escape. Add to this the fact that there may have been a period of drought that constrained resources, causing conflicts to erupt."

Meyer said the theory of conflict between different groups within the LBK is supported by the existence of an apparent ancient border near the Schoeneck-Kilianstaedten site. Archaeologists have found that flint was traded on either side of the divide but not necessarily across it - suggesting the two groups did not see each other as kin, he said.

The attackers, however, spared some members of the group, with victims skewed toward young children, adult men and older women.

"It's likely that the young women, who are missing in the grave, were kidnapped by the attackers," said Meye
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
19,459 Posts
Well, if everyone is proposing theories so can I: I say that it was one group of savages conquering another and they decided to torture them as well. So there, now I'm as much an anthropologist as the climate change ahole.
I dunno a drought seems to me to be a pretty reasonable explanation for what may have triggered the conflict. Forensic evidence should show both malnutrition in the event of a famine, and whether the victims were alive after the leg-breaking for any period of time since bones tend to start to knit very quickly, perhaps this is harder to tell if the victims are also malnourished as this process would presumably be retarded somewhat.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,465 Posts
This just in Obama is blaming Bush for the massacre and that Trump paid to have their shins busted so they could not come out and vote for Hillary.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,402 Posts
Title is misleading. They are saying it was because of a drought. Of course, it's all conjecture, but it makes for a good story.
 

·
Grand Poobah
Joined
·
21,090 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Title is misleading. They are saying it was because of a drought. Of course, it's all conjecture, but it makes for a good story.
I assume you mean the title i chose for the thread is misleading.
From the article
...."indicates that massacres of entire communities were not isolated occurrences but rather were frequent features of the last phases of the LBK."

"But it's possible to put forward theories, based on what's known about the LBK culture and the conditions they faced. For example, the end of LBK culture coincided with a period of climate change."

I don't think the title is misleading. The theory is simple conjecture and fit so wonderfully with the left's climate change scare tactics of today.

This is how ridiculous their conclusions are and how these people shouldn't have a job.
Where's the science in tying climate change with torture?
Sure a drought could cause normadic hunters to travel further and to war on farmers to steal their crops but why massacre them? Why torture them? Their theory fails to explain that and is based on emotion. Not science.
Poorly done too. Obviously climate change is a natural occurance if it happened so dramatically 7000 years ago.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,770 Posts
The second theory arises from unregulated use of the spear and club. This theory says argues that the societies which flourished were those that adopted the view that sticks and stones were owned by the collective tribe and not indivudual cavemen. They also wore skinny furs, had proto-hipster beards, and generally fell into the "gatherer" section of society.
 

·
Unappreciated while still alive
Joined
·
3,801 Posts
The second theory arises from unregulated use of the spear and club. This theory says argues that the societies which flourished were those that adopted the view that sticks and stones were owned by the collective tribe and not indivudual cavemen. They also wore skinny furs, had proto-hipster beards, and generally fell into the "gatherer" section of society.
No one needs more than 7 rocks to kill a gatherer.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top