Good morning all, so I've been doing a little research regarding the now three choices. Here is what I came up with...
Glock 43X L 6.5" W 1.1" HT. 5.04" Weight w/MT Mag 18.7 oz. Barrel 3.42" Price (Cabellas) $530
M&P Shield Plus L 6.1" W 1.1" HT. 4.6" Weight w/MT Mag 17.9 oz. Barrel 3.1" Price (Cabellas) $550
Sig P365 L 5.8" W 1.0" HT. 4.3" Weight w/MT Mag 17.8 oz. Barrel 3.1" Price (Cabellas) $530
Sig 365XL L 6.6" W 1.1" HT. 4.8" Weight w/ MT Mag 20.6 oz. Barrel 3.7" Price (Cabellas) $650
I used Cabellas pricing just as a comparison because they post their prices online, I know there are deals to be had with other shops. I can also get the Glock $100 cheaper, $430 because Glock has special pricing for LEO's and Retired Military. So looking at the comparison, the P365 seems to be the choice size-wise for small concealed carry. I did watch some video's of the 365 and it seems there is (was?) a problem with the mag release button, difficult to release the mag at times, anybody encounter this? Next smallest would be the M&P. Regarding the suggestions to take a Sig XL frame and put the 365 slide on it, I'm guessing that would solve the mag release problem but would make the gun itself bigger, L 5.8" W 1.1" HT. 4.8" Weight w/ MT Mag (approximately) 19 oz. Barrel 3.1" So that configuration would be ALMOST the same as the M&P, would be a touch shorter and a touch heavier. Plus I would have to buy 2 guns (or parts of 2 guns) and that would add to the already hefty price tag of the XL. Any thoughts? Plus what about brand quality, I guess they've all been around forever, any personal preference. I do like that the M&P is made in America and comes with a lifetime warranty. O.K., fire away! Figuratively of course! Thanks...