An interesting video. Please watch and sign the petition.
Petition to tell Trump to reverse ATF's reclassification of Honey Badger pistol
https://gunowners.org/na10072020/
Welcome to Long Island Firearms, Long Island's premier source for news and education!
 |
Welcome to Long Island Firearms, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of Long Island Firearms by signing in or creating an account. You also have the ability to login with your facebook or twitter account. See the icons in the upper right hand corner.
|
The ATF, SBRs, and the Honey Badger With Gun Owners of America
Started by
Scrappy.NY
, Oct 12 2020 07:02 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Scrappy.NY
-
- Club LIF Member
-
- 2773 posts
Gun Guru
- LocationHuntington, NY
Posted October 12 2020 - 07:02 PM
#2
depiazzy
-
- Established Member + Classifieds
- 106 posts
Respected Gunowner
- Locationislip
Posted October 12 2020 - 09:30 PM
They said who cares about bump stocks. Here’s why we cared. Every chance they get there taking things away that are harmless. Repeal the NFA abolish the ATF
#3
ProGodProGunProLife
-
- LIF Site Moderator
- Others: Club LIF Member
-
- 7033 posts
Gun Guru
- LocationSuffolk
Posted October 13 2020 - 06:40 AM
I think the NFA is unconstitutional and should be repealed or overturned, and SBRs should be treated like any other rifles
But, honestly, these "arm braces" have been a sham from the beginning. I was shocked that the ATF got conned into ruling that they were not designed to be fired from the shoulder, in the first place.
Every video I see shows the shooter shouldering them, except a few will mockingly strap the thing around their arm and take a few shots, to show what an absurd use that is.
Maybe if gun owners and manufacturers did a better job of keeping up the pretense, but putting more videos out showing the guns being fired "as designed" the ATF wouldn't have flip flopped.
How did the inventer con the ATF into believing these things were legitimately meant to be fired in the ridiculous, inaccurate, unsafe way the inventer claimed?
They were clearly designed to be shouldered. Again, it shouldn't matter, as SBRs should be treated no differently than other rifles.
The ATF really screwed gun owners with the original decision and now its apparent intention to change the rules.
But, honestly, these "arm braces" have been a sham from the beginning. I was shocked that the ATF got conned into ruling that they were not designed to be fired from the shoulder, in the first place.
Every video I see shows the shooter shouldering them, except a few will mockingly strap the thing around their arm and take a few shots, to show what an absurd use that is.
Maybe if gun owners and manufacturers did a better job of keeping up the pretense, but putting more videos out showing the guns being fired "as designed" the ATF wouldn't have flip flopped.
How did the inventer con the ATF into believing these things were legitimately meant to be fired in the ridiculous, inaccurate, unsafe way the inventer claimed?
They were clearly designed to be shouldered. Again, it shouldn't matter, as SBRs should be treated no differently than other rifles.
The ATF really screwed gun owners with the original decision and now its apparent intention to change the rules.
#4
Ancap
-
- Established Member + Classifieds
- 628 posts
Gun Guru
Posted October 13 2020 - 05:36 PM
Trump should have appointed a better ATF director
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
