If you saw the recent 60 minutes piece on Chicago gun violence, it's obvious that microstamping is totally unnecessary. Let's just hope that the technology is not used on law-abiding firearms owners as in the Maryland case.
Welcome to Long Island Firearms, Long Island's premier source for news and education!
 |
Welcome to Long Island Firearms, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of Long Island Firearms by signing in or creating an account. You also have the ability to login with your facebook or twitter account. See the icons in the upper right hand corner.
|
ATF Ballistic fingerprinting of Chicago guns.
Started by
PaperPunch
, Mar 06 2017 09:46 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
PaperPunch
-
- Established Member
- 69 posts
Marksman
- LocationNassau Co. N.Y.
Posted March 06 2017 - 09:46 PM
#2
Phoenix69
-
- Established Member + Classifieds
- 25239 posts
Gun Guru
- LocationA little place I like to call "you"ll see".
Posted March 06 2017 - 09:53 PM
I never watch 60 minutes.
#3
Steyr AUG man
- Topic Starter
-
- Junior Member
-
- 0 posts
Newbie
Posted March 07 2017 - 12:58 AM
If you saw the recent 60 minutes piece on Chicago gun violence, it's obvious that microstamping is totally unnecessary. Let's just hope that the technology is not used on law-abiding firearms owners as in the Maryland case.
What's "gun violence"? Are a bunch of guns going off unexpectedly all by themselves?
is there some kind of spontaneous ignition or something going on all over Chicago?
I didn't hear of such a phenomenon happening.
I was under the impression they had a criminal violence problem there.
That term you used, if not used for the spontaneous ignition issue i was mentioning above, is only used by one group for one thing - the anti-2A crowd, who uses it as an inflammatory, divisive term that casts guns in an intentionally negative light.
we should not buy into that claptrap. We should not further their agenda by using words like "gun violence" when we really mean "criminal violence" and "assault weapon" (in other than a strict legal discussion of the phrase as used in the law), when we really mean "sporting rifle".
They co-opt words that push their agenda. We shouldnt be surrendering to their corruption of the language for political purposes.
But dont listen to me, as many here say I am a liberal.
#4
PaperPunch
-
- Established Member
- 69 posts
Marksman
- LocationNassau Co. N.Y.
Posted March 07 2017 - 09:50 AM
Duly noted. Thanks for the correction. However, that was the words used in the piece. Not my words. If you notice at the end of my post I use the word "firearm".What's "gun violence"? Are a bunch of guns going off unexpectedly all by themselves?
is there some kind of spontaneous ignition or something going on all over Chicago?
I didn't hear of such a phenomenon happening.
I was under the impression they had a criminal violence problem there.
That term you used, if not used for the spontaneous ignition issue i was mentioning above, is only used by one group for one thing - the anti-2A crowd, who uses it as an inflammatory, divisive term that casts guns in an intentionally negative light.
we should not buy into that claptrap. We should not further their agenda by using words like "gun violence" when we really mean "criminal violence" and "assault weapon" (in other than a strict legal discussion of the phrase as used in the law), when we really mean "sporting rifle".
They co-opt words that push their agenda. We shouldnt be surrendering to their corruption of the language for political purposes.
But dont listen to me, as many here say I am a liberal.
#5
Steyr AUG man
-
- Junior Member
-
- 0 posts
Newbie
Posted March 07 2017 - 10:18 AM
yeah, they will do that with language to whip up sympathy for their cause. we have to be alert not to buy into it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
