<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
 <channel>
  <title>Chit-Chat</title>
  <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/</link>
  <generator>http://www.eblah.com</generator>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
   <title>BLACK HELICOPTERS ??</title>
   <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268359308.21692/</link>
   <comments>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268359308.21692/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Anyone notice any Black helicopters over the last few days?? On Monday and Tuesday, I noticed a pair patrolling along Shore parkway. Monday, they were right above my head. Tuesday, they were to my right, along the shore line. <br /><br />Today, they flew again right over my truck. This time 3 of them, right along Montauk Highway from Babylon, heading west. My wife also saw them from her office window in Seaford. <br /><br />Each time, they seemed to be only a few hundred feet high. <br /><br /><strong>I gotta tell ya, I'm starting to feel a bit like Ray Liotta (Henry Hill) in goodfellas.</strong>]]></description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:01:48</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>T.Webb</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Dept of Education Needs 27 Short-Barreled Shotguns</title>
   <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268345638.67149/</link>
   <comments>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268345638.67149/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Dept of Education Needs 27 Short-Barreled Shotguns? <br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;mode=form&amp;id=cb68cf9f3fa2fe18a83d1c3dee0039b2&amp;tab=core&amp;_cview=0" target='_new'>https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=op.....ab=core&amp;_cview=0</a><br /><br />Solicitation Number: <br />EDOOIG-10-000004 Notice Type: <br />Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Synopsis: <br />Added: Mar 08, 2010 10:39 am <br />The U.S. Department of Education (ED) intends to purchase twenty-seven (27) REMINGTON BRAND MODEL 870 POLICE 12/14P MOD GRWC XS4 KXCS SF. RAMAC #24587 GAUGE: 12 BARREL: 14" - PARKERIZED CHOKE: MODIFIED SIGHTS: GHOST RING REAR WILSON COMBAT; FRONT - XS CONTOUR BEAD SIGHT STOCK: KNOXX REDUCE RECOIL ADJUSTABLE STOCK FORE-END: SPEEDFEED SPORT-SOLID - 14" LOP are designated as the only shotguns authorized for ED based on compatibility with ED existing shotgun inventory, certified armor and combat training and protocol, maintenance, and parts.<br />The required date of delivery is March 22, 2010. <br />Interested sources must submit detailed technical capabilities and any other information that demonstrates their ability to meet the requirements above, no later than March 12, 2010 at 12 PM, E.S.T. Any quotes must be submitted electronically to the attention of Holly.Le@ed.gov, Contract Specialist (Contract Operations Group), with a concurrent copy to Sherese.Lewis@ed.gov, Contracting Officer (Contract Operations Group).<br />The following clauses are applicable to this requirement:<br /><br /><br /><br />52-212-1 Instruction to Offerors - Commercial Items<br />52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items <br />52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items<br />52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items<br />52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required Implementing Statutes or Executive Orders - Commercial Items<br /><br /><br /><br />In accordance with 52.212-2, the fill-in applicable to this requirement is below:<br />52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. <br />As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows: <br />Evaluation-Commercial Items (Jan 1999) <br />(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: <br />(i) Technical Capability<br />(ii) Price<br />In accordance with 52.212-5, the following clauses are applicable to this requirement:<br />52.225-1 Buy American Act - Supplies (February 2009)<br />52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central<br /><br /><br /><br />New equipment only; no remanufactured products. No partial shipments<br />Offer must be good for 30 calendar days after submission.<br />Offerors must have current Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at the time offer is submitted. Information can be found at <a href="http://www.ccr.gov" target='_new'>http://www.ccr.gov</a>.<br />This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items. The Government will award a commercial item purchase order to the offeror with the most advantageous offer to the government. All offerors must submit their best price and delivery capabilities.<br /><br /><br /><br />Place of Delivery: <br />U.S. Department of Education<br />Office of Inspector General<br />c/o: Gary Pawlak, Special Agent<br />500 West Madison Street - Suite 1414<br />Chicago, IL 60661<br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /><br />Contracting Office Address: <br />550 12th Street, SW, 7th Floor<br />Washington, District of Columbia 20202]]></description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:13:58</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Tonto</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Increased Air Traffic AARRRGGHHH!!</title>
   <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268275737.66609/</link>
   <comments>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268275737.66609/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Anyone else affected by the JFK runway work? I'm like smack dab in the flight path. More and more planes due to runway work. Getting to the point there's slight vibration. Never had that here before. I miss the days when the Supersonics (SSTs) would roar right by. Now that was worth feeling and hearing.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:48:57</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>DefMan</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Anyone hear about an attemped machete carjacking ?</title>
   <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268275472.11977/</link>
   <comments>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268275472.11977/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[An attempted machete carjacking in Bellmore?? <br /><br />Anyone hear anything about it??]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:44:32</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>T.Webb</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>NY CONSIDERS 'SALT' BAN IN RESTAURANTS... </title>
   <link>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268274761.27155/</link>
   <comments>http://longislandfirearms.com/forum/m-1268274761.27155/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Sorry if this was posted already, just had to post another symptom of the control freaks in action:<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/local_news/new_york_state/chefs-call-proposed-new-york-salt-ban-absurd-20100310-akd" target='_new'>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/new.....-absurd-20100310-akd</a><br /><br />Chefs Call Proposed New York Salt Ban 'Absurd'<br />Updated: Wednesday, 10 Mar 2010, 8:53 PM EST<br />Published : Wednesday, 10 Mar 2010, 7:36 PM EST<br /><br />By ARUN KRISTIAN DAS / MyFox New York<br /><br />MYFOXNY.COM - Some New York City chefs and restaurant owners are taking aim at a bill introduced in the New York Legislature that, if passed, would ban the use of salt in restaurant cooking.<br /><br />"No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises," the bill, A. 10129 , states in part.<br /><br />The legislation, which Assemblyman Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn, introduced on March 5, would fine restaurants $1,000 for each violation.<br /><br />"The consumer needs to make their own health choices. Just as doctors and the occasional visit to a hospital can't truly control how a person chooses to maintain their health, neither can chefs nor the occasional visit to a restaurant," said Jeff Nathan, the executive chef and co-owner of Abigael's on Broadway. "Modifying trans fats and sodium intake needs to be home based for optimal health. Regulating restaurants will not solve this health issue."<br /><br />Nathan is part of the group My Food My Choice , which calls itself a coalition of chefs, restaurant owners, and consumers, called the proposed law "absurd" in a press release issued on its Facebook page.<br /><br />Ortiz has said the salt ban would allow restaurant patrons to decide how salty they want their meals to be.<br /><br />"In this way, consumers have more control over the amount of sodium they intake, and are given the option to exercise healthier diets and healthier lifestyles," Ortiz said, according to a Nation's Restaurant News report.<br /><br />But many chefs and restaurant owners said they are tired of politicians dictating what they can serve and what people can eat. They have opposed the city's anti-sodium and anti-transfat campaigns.<br /><br />"Chefs would be handcuffed in their food preparation, and many are already in open rebellion over this legislation," said Orit Sklar, of My Food My Choice. "Ortiz and fellow anti-salt zealot Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City seek to undermine the food and restaurant business in the entire state."<br /><br />The American Heart Association encourages Americans to reduce their sodium intake and has advocated the reduction of sodium used by food manufacturers and restaurants by 50 percent over a 10-year period.<br />]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:32:41</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>li4x4</dc:creator>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>